Harris vs Trump: Who Has the Better Economic Policy for Black Americans?

Sign up for our free newsletters, created for the culture by the culture!

• The Block A weekly roundup of Greenwood, Tulsa and Oklahoma news.
• The Daily Holler Local, state and national news in your inbox Monday through Friday.

Sign up

When comparing Kamala Harris’ economic policy with Donald Trump’s platform as they pertain to Black Americans, the primary distinctions are in their approaches to economic growth, social justice, and community empowerment. Here’s an overview: 

1. Tax Relief and Economic Support

• Harris: The Harris plan places a clear emphasis on tax relief targeted at working- and middle-class families through the expansion of the Child Tax Credit and Earned Income Tax Credit. These measures are particularly beneficial to Black American families, many of whom are disproportionately represented in lower-income households. By directly addressing poverty and economic disparities, the Harris plan aligns with the needs of Black Americans, offering financial stability and creating a pathway to lift families out of poverty. 
• Trump: Trump’s plan also focuses on tax cuts, but primarily for workers and businesses. It promotes large-scale tax cuts across the board, including for workers, but it does not directly target lower-income families or address wealth disparities as explicitly. The platform’s focus on reducing inflation and bolstering manufacturing jobs could potentially benefit Black Americans, but it lacks specific provisions aimed at racial equity or addressing the racial wealth gap.

2. Homeownership and Generational Wealth Economic Policy

• Harris: Her plan proposes up to $25,000 in down payment assistance for first-time and first-generation homebuyers, which is particularly important for Black Americans who have historically faced discriminatory housing policies, redlining, and systemic barriers to homeownership. By supporting homeownership, Harris’ plan promotes generational wealth building, which is crucial for addressing long-standing economic inequalities.
• Trump: His platform prioritizes creating a stronger economy through manufacturing and deregulation but does not provide direct financial assistance for homebuyers, particularly first-generation buyers. While economic stability and job creation are important, Trump’s plan does not explicitly address the systemic challenges that have limited Black Americans’ access to homeownership, which is key to reducing the racial wealth gap.

3. Small Business Growth

• Harris: The plan focuses on expanding access to federal contracts and venture capital for minority-owned businesses, including Black entrepreneurs. Black American small business owners, who often face hurdles in accessing traditional lending institutions, would benefit from this targeted support, fostering entrepreneurship and creating opportunities for economic advancement in Black communities.
• Trump: The plan supports small business growth through deregulation and lowering corporate taxes but does not specifically focus on Black-owned businesses or minority entrepreneurs. While general economic growth may help, the plan lacks targeted measures that would address the unique financial barriers faced by Black Americans trying to start or sustain small businesses.

4. Healthcare Affordability

• Harris: Black Americans who experience higher rates of chronic illness and healthcare access disparities would benefit from Harris’s plan to lower prescription drug prices, cap insulin costs, and expand healthcare coverage. The Harris-Walz plan aims to reduce healthcare burdens and ensure more affordable access, addressing a critical issue in Black communities.
• Trump: Trump’s platform supports healthcare reform by promoting competition and reducing regulations, but it does not address specific barriers faced by Black Americans in accessing affordable healthcare. While Trump proposes lowering overall healthcare costs through market-driven solutions, it lacks a targeted approach to address racial healthcare disparities.

5. Workers’ Rights and Wages Economic Policy

• Harris: Raising the minimum wage, eliminating the sub-minimum wage for tipped workers, and strengthening unions are key features of Harris’s plan. Given that many Black Americans work in service industries or in roles affected by wage stagnation, these policies would have a direct impact on lifting Black American workers out of poverty, providing them with greater financial security.
• Trump: Trump’s platform focuses on deregulating industries and promoting economic growth through business incentives but does not emphasize raising the minimum wage or ending sub-minimum wages. The approach prioritizes job creation, which could indirectly benefit Black American workers, but it lacks specific measures to directly address wage disparities.

6. Climate and Environmental Justice

• Harris: The Harris plan emphasizes expanding clean energy initiatives, which are tied to environmental justice, particularly in communities of color that suffer from pollution and environmental hazards. Black American communities, often located near industrial zones, could benefit from these initiatives through job creation and improved environmental conditions.
• Trump: The Trump platform calls for energy independence through traditional energy sources like oil and gas. While this might create jobs, it could disproportionately harm Black American communities that are already affected by pollution and environmental degradation. Trump’s plan lacks a focus on environmental justice or the unique environmental challenges facing Black American communities.

Conclusion:

The Harris economic policy offers more targeted benefits for African Americans, particularly in addressing systemic economic challenges like poverty, homeownership barriers, healthcare access, and wage inequality. By focusing on tax relief, small business support, and environmental justice, the Harris platform aims to create long-term economic stability and uplift for African American communities.

In contrast, the Trump platform focuses on broader economic growth, deregulation, and job creation, but it does not directly address racial inequities or provide specific measures to address the wealth and income gaps that disproportionately affect African Americans. While some aspects, like job creation and tax cuts, could benefit African Americans, the plan lacks a targeted approach to the unique systemic challenges facing Black communities.